TCU
W-L: ( 9- 4) PR = 84.9858Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 901 A UNC ACC ( 5- 7, 75.8) 48-14 913 H Abilene Chr 42-21 920 H SMU ACC ( 8- 4, 84.6) 35-24 926 A Arizona St B12 ( 8- 5, 81.9) 24-27 1004 H Colorado B12 ( 3- 9, 76.1) 35-21 1011 A Kansas St B12 ( 6- 5, 84.0) 28-41 1018 H Baylor B12 ( 4- 8, 75.3) 42-36 1025 A We Virginia B12 ( 4- 8, 78.0) 23-17 1108 H Iowa St B12 ( 7- 4, 82.4) 17-20 1115 A BYU B12 (12- 2, 90.9) 13-44 1122 A Houston B12 (10- 3, 81.7) 17-14 1129 H Cincinnati B12 ( 7- 5, 80.1) 45-23 1230 N USC B10 ( 9- 4, 88.3) 30-27
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
901 A UNC 48-14 34 6 +++ 7.51
920 H SMU 35-24 11 3 +++ 7.95
926 A Arizona St 24-27 -3 0 - -3.41
1004 H Colorado 35-21 14 12 + 2.45
1011 A Kansas St 28-41 -13 -2 --- -11.33
1018 H Baylor 42-36 6 12 --- -6.37
1025 A We Virginia 23-17 6 4 1.68
1108 H Iowa St 17-20 -3 5 --- -8.28
1115 A BYU 13-44 -31 -9 -- -5.37
1122 A Houston 17-14 3 1 + 2.42
1129 H Cincinnati 45-23 22 8 +++ 6.44
1230 N USC 30-27 3 -3 +++ 6.30
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 1011 A Kansas St 28-41 -13 -2 --- -11.33 1018 H Baylor 42-36 6 12 --- -6.37 1108 H Iowa St 17-20 -3 5 --- -8.28 1115 A BYU 13-44 -31 -9 -- -5.37 926 A Arizona St 24-27 -3 0 - -3.41 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 901 A UNC 48-14 34 6 +++ 7.51 920 H SMU 35-24 11 3 +++ 7.95 1129 H Cincinnati 45-23 22 8 +++ 6.44 1230 N USC 30-27 3 -3 +++ 6.30 1004 H Colorado 35-21 14 12 + 2.45 1122 A Houston 17-14 3 1 + 2.42 |
TCU Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston Col ` | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| California | TCU | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | TCU | |
| Clemson | TCU | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | TCU | |
| Duke | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | TCU | |
| Florida St | TCU | TCU | ||
| Georgia Tech | TCU | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | TCU | |
| Louisville | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| Miami | Miami | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Miami | |
| UNC | TCU | TCU | ||
| NC St | TCU | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | TCU | |
| Pittsburgh | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| SMU | TCU | TCU | ||
| Stanford | TCU | TCU 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Syracuse | TCU | TCU 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Virginia | TCU | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | TCU | |
| Va Tech | TCU | TCU | ||
| Wake Forest | TCU | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | TCU | |
| Army | TCU | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | TCU | |
| Charlotte | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| Ea Carolina | TCU | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| Fla Atlantic | TCU | TCU | ||
| Memphis | TCU | TCU | ||
| Navy | TCU | TCU | ||
| No Texas | TCU | TCU | ||
| Rice | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| So Florida | TCU | TCU | ||
| Temple | TCU | TCU | ||
| Tulane | TCU | TCU | ||
| Tulsa | TCU | TCU | ||
| UAB | TCU | TCU | ||
| UTSA | TCU | TCU | ||
| Arizona | Arizona | insuffient: ( 4- 4)( 5- 3) | Arizona | |
| Arizona St | Arizona St | Arizona St | ||
| BYU | BYU | BYU | ||
| Baylor | TCU | TCU | ||
| Cincinnati | TCU | TCU | ||
| Colorado | TCU | TCU | ||
| Houston | TCU | TCU | ||
| Iowa St | Iowa St | Iowa St | ||
| Kansas | TCU | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) | TCU | |
| Kansas St | Kansas St | Kansas St | ||
| Oklahoma St | TCU | TCU 3- 2 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Texas Tech | Texas Tech | Texas Tech 4- 1 vs 2- 3 | ||
| UCF | TCU | TCU 5- 2 vs 1- 6 | ||
| Utah | Utah | Utah 6- 1 vs 4- 3 | ||
| We Virginia | TCU | TCU | ||
| Illinois | Illinois | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Illinois | |
| Indiana | Indiana | Indiana | ||
| Iowa | Iowa | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Iowa | |
| Maryland | TCU | TCU | ||
| Michigan | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| Michigan St | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| Minnesota | TCU | TCU | ||
| Nebraska | TCU | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | TCU | |
| Northwestern | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| Ohio St | Ohio St | Ohio St | ||
| Oregon | Oregon | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Oregon | |
| Penn St | Penn St | Penn St | ||
| Purdue | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| Rutgers | TCU | TCU | ||
| UCLA | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| USC | TCU | TCU | ||
| Washington | Washington | Washington | ||
| Wisconsin | TCU | TCU | ||
| Florida Intl | TCU | TCU | ||
| Jacksonv. St | TCU | TCU | ||
| Kennesaw St | TCU | TCU | ||
| Liberty | TCU | TCU | ||
| La Tech | TCU | TCU | ||
| Middle Tenn | TCU | TCU | ||
| NM St | TCU | TCU | ||
| SHouston St | TCU | TCU | ||
| UTEP | TCU | TCU | ||
| We Kentucky | TCU | TCU | ||
| UMass | TCU | TCU | ||
| Notre Dame | Notre Dame | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Notre Dame | |
| UConn | TCU | TCU | ||
| Akron | TCU | TCU | ||
| Ball St | TCU | TCU | ||
| Bowl. Green | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| Buffalo | TCU | TCU | ||
| Cen Michigan | TCU | TCU | ||
| Ea Michigan | TCU | TCU | ||
| Kent State | TCU | TCU | ||
| MiamiOH | TCU | TCU | ||
| No Illinois | TCU | TCU | ||
| Ohio | TCU | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | TCU | |
| Toledo | TCU | TCU | ||
| We Michigan | TCU | TCU | ||
| Air Force | TCU | TCU | ||
| Boise State | TCU | TCU | ||
| Colorado St | TCU | TCU | ||
| Fresno St | TCU | TCU | ||
| Hawaii | TCU | TCU | ||
| Nevada | TCU | TCU | ||
| New Mexico | TCU | TCU | ||
| San Diego St | TCU | TCU | ||
| San Jose St | TCU | TCU | ||
| UNLV | TCU | TCU | ||
| Utah St | TCU | TCU | ||
| Wyoming | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| Oregon St | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| Wash St | TCU | TCU | ||
| Alabama | Alabama | Alabama | ||
| Arkansas | TCU | TCU | ||
| Auburn | TCU | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | TCU | |
| Florida | TCU | TCU | ||
| Georgia | Georgia | Georgia | ||
| Kentucky | TCU | TCU | ||
| LSU | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| Missouri | Missouri | Missouri | ||
| Miss St | TCU | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | TCU | |
| Oklahoma | Oklahoma | Oklahoma | ||
| Ole Miss | Ole Miss | Ole Miss | ||
| So Carolina | TCU | TCU | ||
| Tennessee | TCU | TCU | ||
| Texas | Texas | Texas | ||
| Texas A&M | Texas A&M | Texas A&M | ||
| Vanderbilt | Vanderbilt | Vanderbilt | ||
| App St | TCU | TCU | ||
| Arkansas State | TCU | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| Coastal Car | TCU | TCU | ||
| Georgia So | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| Georgia St | TCU | TCU | ||
| J Madison | TCU | TCU | ||
| Louisiana | TCU | TCU | ||
| Marshall | TCU | TCU | ||
| Old Dominion | TCU | TCU | ||
| So Miss | TCU | TCU | ||
| So Alabama | TCU | TCU | ||
| Texas State | TCU | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| Troy | TCU | TCU | ||
| La-Monroe | TCU | TCU | ||
| Delaware | TCU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | TCU | |
| Missouri St | TCU | TCU 2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
PowerWise = 111
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 12.75
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A UNC ( 5- 7, 75.8) 48-14 -24.08 23.28 2.67 1.06 55.16
0 H SMU ( 8- 4, 84.6) 35-24 -15.29 32.08 -2.67 1.06 62.48
0 A Arizona St ( 8- 5, 81.9) 24-27 -18.00 29.37 2.67 1.06 -8.14
0 H Colorado ( 3- 9, 76.1) 35-21 -23.79 23.58 -2.67 1.06 44.42
0 A Kansas St ( 6- 5, 84.0) 28-41 -15.91 31.45 2.67 1.06 -7.03
0 H Baylor ( 4- 8, 75.3) 42-36 -24.61 22.76 -2.67 1.06 42.68
0 A We Virginia ( 4- 8, 78.0) 23-17 -21.91 25.46 2.67 1.06 59.78
0 H Iowa St ( 7- 4, 82.4) 17-20 -17.52 29.85 -2.67 1.06 -10.73
0 A BYU (12- 2, 90.9) 13-44 -8.96 38.41 2.67 1.06 -3.34
0 A Houston (10- 3, 81.7) 17-14 -18.17 29.20 2.67 1.06 67.73
0 H Cincinnati ( 7- 5, 80.1) 45-23 -19.80 27.57 -2.67 1.06 52.90
0 N USC ( 9- 4, 88.3) 30-27 -11.62 35.75 -0.00 1.06 75.97
------
431.88
|
winning pts = 461.1184 losing points = -29.2409
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------